Controversy over pure legislation ends in chaos within the EU Parliament – Muricas News

There has by no means been something like this within the EU Parliament both: the day of chaos started on Thursday morning within the Setting Committee of the European Home of Representatives with a rejection of the rejection.

In concrete phrases, this meant: 44 mandataries voted in favor of the legislation for the restoration of nature offered by the EU Fee. However one other 44 lawmakers, together with 22 from the European Individuals’s Social gathering, wished the controversial legislation rejected. Patt – no clear choice.
Then a veritable avalanche of amendments rolled in, so many, so tumultuous and so lengthy that the ultimate vote on the Renaturation Act needed to be postponed to June twenty seventh.

For ÖVP-EU MP Alexander Bernhuber, the “chaos surrounding the vote” alone confirmed that the draft legislation had “failed” and needed to be withdrawn. He fears the proposal might result in falling meals manufacturing in Europe.

local weather change

In an open letter, round 3,000 European scientists countered that fears that meals manufacturing could be lowered due to the legislation are unjustified.

“The best risks for meals and agriculture come from local weather change itself,” says the letter. What is that this core demand of the European Inexperienced Deal, the big European local weather bundle, about?

The plan envisages defending at the least 20 p.c of the land and sea space within the EU. On the similar time, ecosystems comparable to forests are to be reforested, drained moors restored and extra greenery introduced into cities. In keeping with the EU Fee, 4 fifths of Europe’s habitats are in poor situation, with moorland, grasslands and dunes being the toughest hit. That is additionally the scenario in Austria, emphasizes the character conservation group WWF. “Solely 14 p.c of our rivers are in good ecological situation,” says a WWF spokesman.

Austria’s Setting Minister Elenore Gewessler helps the legislation. Within the ranks of their European counterparts, nonetheless, there's additionally some resistance.

Farmers’ Affiliation President Georg Strasser, in flip, accuses the EU Fee of: “It needs to revive nature to the state it was within the Fifties.” He sees this as a “denial of actuality” and a “radical intervention in sustainable Austrian agriculture and forestry”.